Case Study - Parenting Mental Health
Nikki Neale • September 9, 2025

Fractional Leadership, Full Transformation: How Equipt helped rebuild the foundations of a vital UK charity


Not just advice - actual leadership

When Parenting Mental Health (PMH) needed to reset its strategy, structure and sustainability, they didn’t need a consultant. They needed a partner. One who could lead, rebuild and drive change from the inside - without the cost or delay of full-time hires. That’s where Equipt stepped in.


As fractional CEO, we were responsible for every part of the organisation’s next chapter - from rebuilding team infrastructure and leadership processes to redefining the brand, reshaping services, and transforming the approach to fundraising. This was a full organisation-wide reset, delivered hands-on, in real time.


The challenge

PMH is a small charity with big impact. At the centre is a 46,000-strong digital peer support community, built to support parents navigating their child’s poor mental health. But demand was growing fast. Services were at capacity. Internal systems were fragile. The funding model was inconsistent, and the brand — while trusted — lacked the infrastructure and visibility to grow.


The trustee team needed fresh operational direction, deeper strategic support, and the ability to deliver with confidence and pace. But with limited budget and overstretched roles, they couldn’t afford to hire a full-time team to solve it.


What we did

We embedded fractional leadership across the organisation, acting as CEO, strategist, operator, fundraiser and brand steward (we even packed Christmas Cards and Sweatshirts on occasion). Our role covered the full scope of executive responsibility, with a laser focus on getting the organisation fit for the future.


  • Defined and refined the vision, mission, and organisational structure
  • Delivered full strategic planning across operations, service and fundraising
  • Built a robust people and volunteer infrastructure
  • Developed and implemented an all-new fundraising strategy — achieving £100k+ in community giving for the first time
  • Refocused the brand to serve both families and funders
  • Rebuilt processes, content and structure around the three PMH pillars: Support, Skill and Inform
  • Launched flagship services including the Be Programme and refreshed Partnering Not Parenting offer
  • Overhauled reporting, impact data and funder communications
  • Represented the organisation in media, partnerships and board settings


This was full-scale leadership — strategic and operational — without the overhead of a permanent hire.

Website page

How we rolled it out

We acted as both coach and captain. Internally, we built a new team structure and culture, recruiting key roles and reshaping volunteer models to match growing demand. We introduced clear processes for safeguarding, reporting, communications and finance. We transitioned volunteers into paid roles, created new pathways for progression, and championed inclusive practices across community operations.


On the public side, we led all brand and communications work. That included a national PR campaign, the launch of the Lived Experience report, appearances on BBC and LBC, and significant audience growth across all channels — with Facebook followers up 34%, YouTube views up 22%, and a 29% increase in unique website visitors.


Behind the scenes, we built the fundraising engine. We established and delivered on targets across community giving, grants and corporate partners. We created the first ever PMH fundraising strategy and comms pack, brought new funders on board, and generated new recurring income streams.


The results

  • £100,000 raised through community giving and events — more than double previous years
  • 46,000+ parents supported through a now robust digital community
  • 5,368 new comments, 825,000 community reactions, and 291,000 written responses
  • 200+ scholarship places awarded on Partnering Not Parenting
  • 260 applications for 50 places on the pilot of The Be Programme
  • Brand presence across BBC News, LBC, and national press
  • 29% growth in website visitors, now reaching over 55,000 unique users
  • New paid team roles, safeguarding frameworks, and clear succession plan in place


Why it worked

Because this wasn’t an advisory relationship — it was real, practical leadership.

We didn’t just write strategies. We built systems. Delivered programmes. Trained teams. Secured funding. Steered the ship.


Fractional leadership gave PMH the senior thinking and decision-making it needed — without the burden of long recruitment cycles or high fixed costs. It gave them confidence, momentum and clarity, fast.


And most importantly, it gave thousands of parents better, braver support when they needed it most.

A LITTLE MORE READING

By Nikki Neale February 20, 2026
How Jellycat made their fortune There is a version of strategy that lives entirely inside the category you operate in (in fact most strategy is here). It studies competitors, benchmarks pricing, refines positioning statements and tweaks messaging frameworks. It is diligent, sensible and often very well executed. And then there is the version that asks a more expansive question: what is happening in the wider market that could fundamentally change the trajectory of this business? Jellycat is a compelling example of what happens when you write strategy with that second lens. Founded in 1999, Jellycat spent years building a strong reputation as a premium plush brand. Its products were soft, distinctive and giftable, and it achieved wide distribution. It was a good business and a steady one. What it had not yet become was a cultural phenomenon. The inflection point did not begin in the toy aisle. It began in culture. During the pandemic, comfort became a form of social permission. Softness stopped being something that belonged purely to childhood and became something adults embraced publicly. Nostalgia evolved from memory into aesthetic. The rise of the so-called “kidult” reflected a genuine generational shift, with Millennials and Gen Z openly purchasing objects that felt playful, ironic and emotionally expressive.
By Nikki Neale October 22, 2025
Warning, if you’re not one of the 7 million people who watched Celeb Traitor’s live last week (look at you go terrestrial telly!) you might want to scroll on. For everyone else, here are my top five comparisons between the castle and the average workplace. Alan and Paloma: when friendship and politics mix Alan Carr murdering Paloma Faith early on is the perfect example of how proximity and power collide. They were friends. They laughed together. Worked together. Seemed inseparable. He killed her anyway. Not maliciously or even strategically, she was just an easy target, and he needed to save his own skin. Because in Traitors, like work, beware the relationships that only last as long as they’re useful. Charisma isn’t integrity, and “getting on well” doesn’t mean “aligned.” We’ve all had a ‘mate’ at work like Alan: funny, charming, likeable and the next minute torching your project to get ahead. Sh*t! Jonathan Ross vs Ruth Codd: the calm, the storm, and the power dynamic Jonathan Ross is now facing heat, definitely helped along by Ruth Codd going in on him! She had a point, she just didn’t land it. Ruth got angry, frustrated, emotional. Jonathan stayed calm, almost detached. And that was it: in the group’s eyes, the rational one won. But watch it again. That wasn’t calm; it was control. Ruth’s younger, newer, female. Jonathan’s older, famous, a man of the establishment. It was a masterclass in unspoken hierarchy and how people can manipulate the unconscious bias of everyone around them. So many meetings have that moment: one person fighting to be heard while another takes over, with zero merit, because they have privilege and a power dynamic you can’t beat. Bums!
September 16, 2025
As my nan used to say - you can tell a lot about a place from its toilets. And it's fair to say, when it comes to experiences, I'm obsessed with them. You might arrive at a beautiful office, a busy café, or a slick visitor attraction. The welcome is polished, the branding sharp, the service rehearsed. And then you slip away to the loo and suddenly you see the truth. A broken lock. A soap dispenser that hasn’t been filled in days. A faded Covid sign still taped to the mirror like a ghost of 2020. All the polish of the front-of-house vanishes. Because if they’ve stopped noticing here, what else have they stopped noticing? Why toilets punch above their weight Toilets don’t get design awards (often), they don’t appear on campaign mood boards, and they rarely make the budget spreadsheet. Yet they shape experience and demonstrate culture more than almost any other space. The numbers prove it: over 80% of facility complaints relate to toilets, and more than four in five people say a bad loo puts them off returning. In restaurants and hospitality, dirty toilets cut repeat visits by around 20%. Psychologists call it the Peak-End Rule: people judge experiences by their extremes and by how they end. Which makes the loo dangerous territory. For many customers, it’s the last stop before they leave. If the final impression is disappointment - no soap, a cracked seat, the faint smell of neglect (or worse), that’s what tips the memory from positive to no thanks. The workplace test In offices, toilets are culture in miniature. An employer can talk endlessly about wellbeing, inclusion, and values, but the loos tell the truth. Free sanitary products? Clean mirrors? Lighting that flatters rather than exposes? These are the signals staff notice every day. They’re not perks; they’re respect. And don’t start me on the signs telling people to clean up after themselves. Really? Are we dealing with adults or running a nursery? More often than not it’s a response to one incident with one person, and the rest of the workforce gets a lifetime of infantilising posters. That says more about the culture than the mess ever did. Employees don’t measure culture by the slogans on the wall. They measure it by whether the hand dryer works.
By Nikki Neale September 2, 2025
Every business faces the same question when planning for the year ahead: what should we spend on marketing? There isn’t a clean-cut answer. Nobody has the formula that guarantees growth. What matters is whether your budget matches the growth you’re actually chasing. From a sales and marketing perspective, most small to mid-sized businesses sit in one of three lanes: Zero, Incremental, or Exceptional. Smaller businesses tend to hover in zero, the more established ones work in incremental, and only a bold few step into exceptional. The trick is not which lane you choose, but whether you’re honest about being in it. Zero: hoping for the best Zero is the lane of survival. Most micro-SMEs end up here by default. Marketing isn’t in the budget, it’s something the founder (or another willing team member) crams into evenings and weekends. Social posts, the odd flyer, and a heavy reliance on word of mouth or personal networks. The problem is that “no budget” never really means no cost. It means you’re paying in hidden ways: slower sales cycles because there’s no air cover for the pipeline, lost opportunities because potential customers don’t know you exist, and founder time that disappears into DIY marketing instead of running the business. Zero can sustain you. It can keep the lights on. But very few businesses scale out of this lane without committing something more deliberate. Survival simply isn’t the same as growth. Incremental: the steady road Incremental growth is where SMEs start to get serious. If you’re getting serious your budget should be within 4–7% of your revenue, which is enough to create rhythm: SEO that doesn’t get forgotten, email that lands every month, campaigns that repeat, and the odd test of a new channel. Sales still lean on retention and referrals, but with more discipline in the pipeline you’ll create more cause and effect. Gail’s Bakery is a brilliant lesson in what incremental looks like at its best. The first site opened in Hampstead in 2005, but for years it was just a few shops in North London. The real shift came in 2011 when external investment gave Gail’s the capital to expand carefully, bakery by bakery. Each new shop was chosen with precision: affluent commuter towns, established London neighbourhoods, places where the brand could bed in rather than overreach - all critical (and often overlooked) essentials of marketing. That’s why today, when you walk through Marlow, Clapham, or St Albans, you can’t miss a Gail’s. It feels like they’re everywhere, but it’s been twenty years of patient, disciplined growth. Incremental doesn’t make headlines in year one, but it compounds until suddenly the brand feels unavoidable. Exceptional: the bold bet Exceptional growth is when we choose to accelerate. Marketing budgets rise to 10–15% of revenue or more, and that spend is matched with operational readiness and, crucially, risk appetite. This lane buys visibility, reach, and cultural momentum if you’re willing to back it. Take Gymshark. The myth will have you believe it was entirely organic; a teenager in a Birmingham garage who struck gold through social media alone. It wasn’t. The truth is more complex. Yes, Ben Francis built a community, but Gymshark also spent aggressively on influencer partnerships, international events, and flagship stores to cement its place. That growth wasn’t accidental or free; it was funded, risky, and carefully engineered. Lucky Saint shows the same dynamic in another category. Founded in 2018, it positioned itself as a credible, grown-up alcohol-free beer in a space dominated by mass brands. From early on, Lucky Saint invested heavily in brand and experience: PR, creative partnerships, and eventually a bricks-and-mortar pub in London. For a small brewer, that’s a bold move, but it paid off. The spend signalled ambition, and the market responded. Exceptional growth isn’t a casual decision. It means bigger budgets, more risk, and a level of operational readiness that many SMEs underestimate. But when ambition and investment line up, it creates step-change growth that incremental spend rarely delivers. The mismatch trap If you’re reading this with huge ambition and a budget line of zero, it’s time for a check-in. The biggest problems happen not when you choose a lane, but when you kid yourself about which lane you’re in. Champagne ambition, beer budget. Some businesses set accelerated growth targets but fund them with incremental budgets. The marketing team (if there even is one) is told to double awareness or leads on the same spend as last year, or to land national coverage with nothing more than local-level funds. It creates frustration, wasted energy, and the creeping belief that “marketing doesn’t work,” when in truth it was never resourced to match the ambition. Champagne budget, no hangover cure. Others do the opposite. They throw big money at marketing while the rest of the business is still built for incremental growth. Leads flow in, awareness rises, but operations can’t deliver the experience. Customer service cracks, delivery timelines slip, and the reputation you just paid to build is quickly eroded. Exceptional marketing without exceptional operations doesn’t accelerate growth; it accelerates churn. Hope springs eternal. Then there’s the subtler trap of sitting in zero while planning for growth. A founder convinces themselves that word of mouth will carry them through another year, while quietly expecting sales to grow 20%. When it doesn’t happen, the blame gets pointed everywhere except the missing budget line. You can’t compound visibility you never paid for in the first place.  Planning for the year ahead Budgets are signals of intent. They tell your team, and yourself, whether you’re serious about survival, steady growth, or acceleration. They set expectations for sales, operations, and delivery before a single social post goes live. If you’re one of the 1000s of SMEs working on next year’s plans right now and you’re unsure whether your budget matches your ambition, that’s exactly where Perspective Analysis comes in. We stress-test your business for growth, help bring clarity to which lane you’re really in, and align sales, marketing and ops so your plan has a fighting chance of working. If you want a defensible budget and a growth plan that holds up past January, start with Perspective Analysis.